False Flag Alert [1] ~ The
Paris Terrorist Attacks,
“9/11 French-Style”, “Le 11
septembre à la française”
14 Nov 2015
«The aim, all too obvious, is to have an incontrovertible and very
strong excuse, needed for a direct Western military intervention on Syrian
soil, to counter the Russian anti-terrorism operations (that are putting in
serious difficulty the gangs of “moderate terrorists” backed by the Western
military intelligence to oppose the legitimate government in Damascus).
A plan like the
Libyan one, but in a version more complicated because of the Syrian resistance
and the Russian intervention. The dirty manual labor (as for the 9/11) is
always wahhabi/jihadist, of the most rude and ignorant species, but always
directed by the same lobbies.
What changes is
that all of us already know this game, and even more is known in Moscow, Tehran
and Beijing. Because for the question “Cui Prodest” there is only one answer, that
as crazy as it sounds, is unfortunately the only one realistic» (by SFP-WP-Syrian Patriots).
«Terrorist attacks
have been carried simultaneously in several locations in the Paris metropolitan
area, according to early report. According to reports (at the time of writing) 100
people were killed in the Bataclan Concert Hall, when terrorists opened fire
with automatic weapons. Another 15 were killed at the Stadium of France
outside Paris. Official reports at the time of writing (21.oo ET) point to more than
140 deaths. Our thoughts are with the family members of the victims, who have
lost their loved ones» (by Prof Michel Chossudovsky Global Research, November 14, 2015).
Within minutes following the attacks, which were launched
simultaneously, and prior to the release of a preliminary report by the police,
France’s media went into overdrive. News commentators and intelligence analysts
on France’s network TV stated with authority that the attacks emanated from
Syria and Iraq.
The media coverage of these tragic events was casually linked up with
the war in the Middle East, highlighting France’s commitment –alongside its
allies– in waging a “humanitarian war” against the terrorists. The Islamic
State was identified as the architect of the attacks. The attacks were
described without evidence as an act of revenge and retribution against France
for having bombed ISIS strongholds in Syria and Iraq as part of Obama’s
counter-terrorism air campaign.
Foreknowledge?
Paris Match on October 2nd predicted a French Style 9/11, “un 11
septembre à la française”. The threat is real, according to Judge Trévédic in
an interview with Paris Match. “The attacks in France will be on a
scale comparable to 9/11’’.
None of the early news reports on November 13th, mentioned the fact that
a large scale and well organized terrorist attack had been predicted. The title
of the media report below is: “Intelligence services fear a 9/11 French Style”.
Yet in a bitter irony the October report stated that these forthcoming
attacks were difficult to avoid: ”impossible a dejouer”, suggesting that French
intelligence is inept and unable to prevent a forthcoming catastrophe.
What was the role of this media hype? Create an
atmosphere of fear and intimidation?
France’s president Francois Hollande no doubt was aware of the October
warnings. He had been briefed by his intelligence advisers.
Shortly before midnight local time on November 13, president François
Hollande announced drastic police state measures against an alleged terrorist
network operating nationwide. It is highly unlikely, however, that Hollande
took this decision spontaneously in the evening of November 13, on the spur of
the moment in response to the attacks and prior to the holding of a
cabinet meeting. The decision to enact a State of Emergency had no doubt
been envisaged in advance of the attack in relation to a potential terrorist
attack scenario.
As we recall, the last time a State of Emergency was enacted was in May
1961 in response to the Algiers putsch (Putsch d’Alger), a failed
coup d’état to overthrow President Charles de Gaulle’s government.
His speech had the appearances of having been scripted –i.e with regard
to the adoption of a State of Emergency, a far-reaching political decision:
«My dear compatriots
As I speak, terrorist attacks of unprecedented
proportions are underway in the Paris area. There are dozens killed, there are
many injured. It is a horror. We have, on my decision, mobilised all
forces possible to neutralise the terrorists and make all concerned areas safe.
I have also asked for military reinforcements. They are currently in the
Paris area, to ensure that no new attack can take place. I have also
called a cabinet meeting that will be held in a few minutes. [the measures are
announced before consultation with the Cabinet]
Two decisions will be taken: a state of emergency will
be declared, which means that some places will be closed, traffic
may be banned , and there will also be searches which may be decided
throughout Ile de France (greater Paris). The state of emergency will be
proclaimed throughout the territory (of France).
The second decision I have made is to close the
borders. We must ensure that no one enters to commit any
crimes and that those who have committed the crimes that we have unfortunately
seen can also be arrested if they should leave the territory.
This is a terrible ordeal which once again assails us.
We know where it comes from, who these criminals are, who these
terrorists are.
In these difficult moments, we must – and I’m thinking
of the many victims, their families and the injured – show compassion and
solidarity. But we must also show unity and calm.
Faced with terror, France must be strong, it must be
great and the state authorities must be firm. We will be.
We must also call on everyone to be responsible.
What the terrorists want is to scare us and fill us
with dread. There is indeed reason to be afraid. There is dread, but in the
face of this dread, there is a nation that knows how to defend itself, that knows
how to mobilise its forces and, once again, will defeat the terrorists.
French citizens, we have not completed the operations.
There are still some that are extremely difficult. It’s at this moment that the
security forces are staging an assault, especially in a place in Paris.
I ask you to keep all your trust in what we can do
with the security forces to protect our nation from terrorist acts.
Long live the Republic and long live France» (emphasis
added).
France is under attack. We must defend ourselves. The political
discourse is in some regards reminiscent of the 9/11 attacks and the statements
of George W. Bush et al. The media immediately started comparing the November
13 attacks in Paris to 9/11.
Police State Measures
President Hollande had ordered by decree without debate or consultation
with France’s National Assembly the enactiment of a State of Emergency
throughout France, coupled with the closing of France’s borders allegedly to
prevent terrorists from coming in, and from terror suspects from leaving the
country.
The measures also included procedures which enable the police to conduct
arbitrary arrests and house searches without a warrant within the Paris
metropolitan area opening up the development of a potential hate campaign
directed against France’s Muslim population.
These drastic police state measures (including the repeal of habeas
corpus) ordered by president Hollande were decided upon prior and in the
absence of a police report. Initial reports confirmed the involvement of half a
dozen terrorists. There was no evidence of a nationwide network.
But as we mentioned above, Hollande had no doubt been briefed by French
intelligence which had, according to reports, “predicted” the possibility of a
9/11 style attack. (October 2 media reports).
France had been heralded in Paris Match, October 2, 2015 as the
Number One Target of the Islamic State, “a terrorist army with unlimited
potential…” The threat and diverse forms it can take suggest that our
counter-terrorist abilities are no longer effective as they used to be”.
President Hollande assumed that jihadists were behind the attacks, but
when he made his speech, there was no evidence from police sources to support
his statements. Moreover, with regard to the Bataclan Concert Hall where there
were more than one thousand people at a Rock concert, the reports confirmed
that there were four kamikaze terrorists, all of them were killed. As in the
case of Charlie Hebdo and the Kosher Grocery Store terrorist attacks in January
2015, the terrorists were killed rather than arrested and indicted.
Was there an attempt on the part of the police to capture them alive?
Moreover, the media was held at bay, they were not allowed to report
what was happening within the Concert Hall, they were prevented from talking to
the witnesses underlying this tragic event.
Meanwhile a curfew was imposed.
President Obama made a declaration early in the evening (ET) largely
sustaining the “war on terrorism” narrative:
THE PRESIDENT: «Good evening, everybody. I just want
to make a few brief comments about the attacks across Paris tonight. Once
again, we’ve seen an outrageous attempt to terrorize innocent civilians. This
is an attack not just on Paris, it’s an attack not just on the people of
France, but this is an attack on all of humanity and the universal values that
we share.
We stand prepared and ready to provide whatever
assistance that the government and the people of France need to respond.
France is our oldest ally. The French people have stood shoulder to shoulder
with the United States time and again. And we want to be very clear that we
stand together with them in the fight against terrorism and extremism.
………… We’re going to do whatever it takes to work with
the French people and with nations around the world to bring these
terrorists to justice, and to go after any terrorist networks that go after our
people.
We don’t yet know all the details of what has
happened. We have been in contact with French officials to communicate
our deepest condolences to the families of those who have been killed, to offer
our prayers and thoughts to those who have been wounded. We have offered
our full support to them. The situation is still unfolding.
……. This is a heartbreaking situation. And
obviously those of us here in the United States know what it’s like. We’ve
gone through these kinds of episodes ourselves. And whenever these kinds
of attacks happened, we’ve always been able to count on the French people to
stand with us. They have been an extraordinary counterterrorism partner,
and we intend to be there with them in that same fashion»… (emphasis added).
Obama is committed to helping the French people, in going after the
terrorists. France is a partner of Obama’s bombing campaign initiated in
August-September 2014 which theoretically is directed against the ISIS.
Hollande is described by Obama as an “extraordinary counterterrorism
partner”. In turn, Hollande referring to the Islamic State says “We
know where [Syria, Iraq] it comes from, who these criminals are, who these
terrorists are”.
The clash of civilizations is implicit in Obama’s statement: “This is an
attack on all of humanity and the universal values that we share.”
Who is Behind the Terrorists?
What the French media in its coverage of these tragic events fails to
mention is that both the US and France, not to mention Britain, Turkey, Saudi
Arabia, Qatar and Israel are covertly supporting various Al Qaeda affiliated
terrorist formations in Syria and Iraq including al Nusrah and the Islamic
State.
France is the victim of the Islamic State, but at the same time the US
and its allies including France are “State sponsors” of the Islamic state which
is an Al Qaeda affiliated entity.
Lest we forget, the US has supported Al Qaeda and its affiliated
organizations for almost half a century since
the heyday of the Soviet Afghan war. CIA training camps were set up in
Pakistan. In the ten year period from 1982 to 1992, some 35,000 jihadists from 43 Islamic countries were recruited by
the CIA to fight in the Afghan jihad. Since the Reagan Administration,
Washington has supported the Islamic terror network.
In recent developments in the Middle East, the terrorists are recruited
and trained by the Western military alliance. NATO and the Turkish High Command
have been responsible for the recruitment of ISIS and Al Nusrah mercenaries from
the outset of the Syrian insurgency in March 2011. According to Israeli
intelligence sources, this initiative consisted in “a
campaign to enlist thousands of Muslim volunteers in Middle East countries and
the Muslim world to fight alongside the Syrian rebels. The Turkish army would
house these volunteers, train them and secure their passage into Syria (DEBKA file, NATO to give rebels anti-tank weapons, August 14, 2011).
There are Western Special Forces and Western intelligence operatives
within the ranks of the ISIS. British Special Forces, and MI6 have been
involved in training jihadist rebels in Syria.
The Islamic State (ISIS), the alleged architect of the Paris attacks,
was originally an Al Qaeda affiliated entity created by US
intelligence with the support of Britain’s MI6, Israel’s Mossad,
Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and Saudi Arabia’s General
Intelligence Presidency (GIP), Ri’āsat Al-Istikhbārāt Al-’Āmah ( رئاسة الاستخبارات العامة).
The ISIS brigades were involved in the US-NATO supported insurgency in
Syria directed against the government of Bashar al Assad. Since
August-September 2014, they are the object of Osama’s counter-terrorism
campaign. The evidence, however, amply confirms that ISIS is protected by the
Western military alliance.
With regard to France, a Washington Post 2011 report entitled “France sent arms to Libyan rebels,”
confirms the role of the French government in support of the Al Qaeda
affiliated Libya Islamic fighting Group (LIFG): «French officials announced Wednesday that they had
armed rebels in Libya, marking the first time a NATO country has said it was
providing direct military aid to opponents [LIFG]…».
According to Tony Cartalucci (Global Research: January 8, 2015): «While Hollande’s predecessor, former French President Nicolas Sarkozy
would be the one to set foot in decimated Libya in the wake of NATO’s
intervention there – which included in addition to French arms sent to
terrorists, French planes providing these terrorists air cover as they carried
out atrocities and genocide – Hollande would continue policies enacted under
Sarkozy, both in Libya, and currently in Syria».
In early 2013, France joined its coalition partners in sending weapons
to jihadist rebels in Syria including the Al Qaeda affiliated Al Nusra Front
which France’s Le Monde identified as “moderate”:
«The UK Foreign secretary William Hague, and his
French counterpart Lauren Fabius, are leading an isolated charge within the EU
to lift a supposed arms embargo to self-described ‘rebels’,
hitherto destroying Syria for over two years. Several underlying factors need
to be addressed before these diplomatic (some would say military) manoeuvres
are put into context.
Firstly, the most obvious issue with allowing the
UK and France to freely arm ‘rebels’ of their choosing inside Syria is that
this policy is against all international law, and will, as proven already to be
the case, continue to vastly exacerbate the growing death toll and displacement
in Syria. As the head of arms control at Oxfam noted: “Transferring more
weapons to Syria can only exacerbate a hellish scenario for civilians. If the
UK and France are to live up to their own commitments – including those set out
in the new arms trade treaty – they simply must not send weapons to Syria.”
In recent developments, the ISIS and Al Nusrah have
joined hands. (Philip Greaves, Under the Disguise of The “Battle against Terrorism”:
The U.S., Britain and France Support “Al Qaeda in Syria”, Global
Research, May 28, 2013».
The evidence amply confirms that while Russia is targeting ISIS
strongholds in Syria, the Western military alliance is supporting the Islamic
State terrorists.
The notion that the Paris attacks was an act of retribution and revenge
directed against France is questionable and contradictory inasmuch as the
evidence confirms that France has been channelling weapons to jihadist rebels
in Syria including Al Nusrah and ISIS.
Concluding Remarks
On November 13, France was the victim of a carefully organized terrorist
attack in different locations in the Paris metropolitan area, resulting in more
than 140 deaths. The Islamic State was identified as the architect of this
criminal attack.
What is intimated in the media reports of these tragic events is that
the jihadists are attacking France. But at same time, the countries which claim
to be the victims of terrorism including France are involved through their
intelligence services in supporting terrorist organizations in the Middle East.
It’s called America’s “Global War on Terrorism”.
This contradiction has to be meaningfully addressed at the political
level. The Global War on Terrorism is a lie. The state of emergency gives the
police a green light to arrest on mere suspicion throughout France.
A telephone hotline is opened. Citizens are invited to call and
report anything which they consider suspicious. Civil rights have been
suspended. Arbitrary arrests are occurring in Paris without warrant. The
attacks could potentially contribute to a new wave of Islamophobia.
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου